Pedro Vives Marcos vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W W W W
Form
L W L L W W L L W LHead-2-Head: Marcos 1 - 1 Ruiz
They have played 5 sets in total, with Marcos winning 3 and Ruiz winning 2. The last match between Marcos and Ruiz was at the M15 Antalya, 31-03-2021, First, Clay with Pablo Llamas Ruiz getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pedro Vives Marcos | 1 |
| Pablo Llamas Ruiz | 1 |
M15 Antalya(31-03-2021)
3
6
6
2
6
3
| Marcos | Stats | Ruiz |
|---|---|---|
| 100% (5-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (5-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 689 | Ranking | 614 |
| 515 | Highest Rank | 131 |
| 24 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 4 |
| 58% (139-102) | Career Total W/L | 60% (154-102) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $129,940 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Struff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 21 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:53:0 | Average Match Time | 1:53:0 |
| 57% (80/140) | 1st Serve % | 66% (88/134) |
| 73% (58/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (56/88) |
| 47% (28/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (26/46) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 39% (52/134) | Return Points Win % | 39% (54/140) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pedro Vives Marcos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Deney Wassermann
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Carlos Lopez Montagud
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Martinez
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Edoardo Zanada
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 0-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Rudolf Molleker
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
16 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Daniel Rincon
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steven Diez
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Andres Andrade
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (139/102) | Win/Loss | 60% (154/102) |
| 57% (300/229) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (344/238) |
| 53% (2607/2334) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2943/2565) |
| 58% (60/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (21/24) |
| 59% (78/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (127/70) |
| 25% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (5/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 415 | Aces Total | 424 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 462 | Total Double Faults | 302 |
| 1:14:40 | Average Match Time | 1:34:21 |
| 437.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.6 |
| 60% (6807/11428) | 1st Serve % | 68% (11320/16617) |
| 67% (4543/6807) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (7286/11320) |
| 49% (2270/4621) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2673/5297) |
| 45% (565/1242) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (838/1842) |
| 42% (4836/11537) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6975/16451) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 61% (11/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (7/11) | Challenger W/L | 59% (56/39) |
| 59% (132/91) | Futures W/L | 62% (83/51) |
| 58% (136/233) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (151/248) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (31/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (39/76) |
| 53% (29/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (36/74) |
| 90% (134/120) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (157/138) |
| 10% (134/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (157/19) |
| 17% (107/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (99/15) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
